本文共 10827 字，大约阅读时间需要 36 分钟。
在《》中，我们谈到WCF自定义授权体系具有两个核心的组件：AuthorizationPolicy和ServiceAuthorizationManager，已经它们是如何写作最终提供一种基于声明的授权实现。为了让自定义授权有深刻的理解，我们来进行一个简单实例来演示如何通过自定义这两个组件实现“非角色授权策略”。[源代码从下载]
目录：
一、创建演示程序解决方案 二、自定义AuthorizationPolicy 三、自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager 四、应用自定义AuthorizationPolicy和ServiceAuthorizationManager
。我们这个实例依然采用简单的计算服务的例子，并且采用如下图所示的解决方案结构。不过，为了后续的授权策略需要，我们在服务契约ICalculator接口上定义如下四个分别表示加、减、乘、除的四个运算操作。当然服务类型CalculatorService也进行相应的修正。
ICalculator：
1: using System.ServiceModel;
2: namespace Artech.WcfServices.Contracts
3: { 4: [ServiceContract(Namespace = "http://www.artech.com/")]
5: public interface ICalculator
6: { 7: [OperationContract(Action = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/add")]
8: double Add(double x, double y);
9: [OperationContract(Action = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/subtract")]
10: double Subtract(double x, double y);
11: [OperationContract(Action = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/multiply")]
12: double Multiply(double x, double y);
13: [OperationContract(Action = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/divide")]
14: double Divide(double x, double y);
15: }
16: }
CalculatorService：
1: using Artech.WcfServices.Contracts;
2: namespace Artech.WcfServices.Services
3: { 4: public class CalculatorService : ICalculator
5: { 6: public double Add(double x, double y)
7: { 8: return x + y;
9: }
10: public double Subtract(double x, double y)
11: { 12: return x - y;
13: }
14: public double Multiply(double x, double y)
15: { 16: return x * y;
17: }
18: public double Divide(double x, double y)
19: { 20: return x / y;
21: }
22: }
23: }
现在我们的授权策略是这样的：操作Add和Subtract针对仅对用户Foo开放，而Multiply和Divide操作仅对用户Bar开放。虽然这个简单的授权完全可以通过在相应的服务操作方法上应用PrincipalPermissionAttribute并指定Name属性来实现。但是我们要尝试通过自定义AuthorizationPolicy和ServiceAuthorizationManager来实现这样的授权策略。先来看看自定义的AuthorizationPolicy的定义。
我们将自定义的AuthorizationPolicy创建在Hosting项目中。由于IAuthorizationPolicy定义在System.IdentityModel程序集中，我们先为Hosting项目添加该程序集的引用。由于授权策略比较简单，我们直接上自定义的AuthorizationPolicy命名为SimpleAuthorizationPolicy，下面是整个SimpleAuthorizationPolicy的定义。
1: using System;
2: using System.Collections.Generic;
3: using System.IdentityModel.Claims;
4: using System.IdentityModel.Policy;
5: using System.Linq;
6: namespace Artech.WcfServices.Hosting
7: { 8: public class SimpleAuthorizationPolicy : IAuthorizationPolicy
9: { 10: private const string ActionOfAdd = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/add";
11: private const string ActionOfSubtract = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/subtract";
12: private const string ActionOfMultiply = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/multiply";
13: private const string ActionOfDivide = "http://www.artech.com/calculator/divide";
14:
15: internal const string ClaimType4AllowedOperation = "http://www.artech.com/allowed";
16:
17: public SimpleAuthorizationPolicy()
18: { 19: this.Id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
20: }
21: public bool Evaluate(EvaluationContext evaluationContext, ref object state)
22: { 23: if (null == state)
24: { 25: state = false;
26: }
27: bool hasAddedClaims = (bool)state;
28: if (hasAddedClaims)
29: { 30: return true; ;
31: }
32: IListclaims = new List ();
33: foreach (ClaimSet claimSet in evaluationContext.ClaimSets)
34: { 35: foreach (Claim claim in claimSet.FindClaims(ClaimTypes.Name, Rights.PossessProperty))
36: { 37: string userName = (string)claim.Resource;
38: if (userName.Contains('\\')) 39: { 40: userName = userName.Split('\\')[1]; 41: if (string.Compare("Foo", userName, true) == 0) 42: { 43: claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimType4AllowedOperation,ActionOfAdd, Rights.PossessProperty));
44: claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimType4AllowedOperation, ActionOfSubtract, Rights.PossessProperty));
45: }
46: if (string.Compare("Bar", userName, true) == 0) 47: { 48: claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimType4AllowedOperation,ActionOfMultiply, Rights.PossessProperty));
49: claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimType4AllowedOperation, ActionOfDivide, Rights.PossessProperty));
50: }
51: }
52: }
53: }
54: evaluationContext.AddClaimSet(this, new DefaultClaimSet(this.Issuer, claims));
55: state = true;
56: return true;
57: }
58: public ClaimSet Issuer
59: { 60: get { return ClaimSet.System; } 61: }
62: public string Id { get; private set; } 63: }
64: }
我们主要来介绍Evaluate方法中，该方法主要的逻辑是这样的：通过EvaluationContext现有的声明集获取当前的用户名（声明类型和声明权限分别为ClaimTypes.Name和Rights.PossessProperty）。针对获取出来的用户名，创建于被授权服务操作关联的声明。其中声明的三要素（类型、权限和资源）分别为：“http://www.artech.com/allowed”、Rights.PossessProperty和操作的Action。最后将这些声明组成一个声明集添加到EvaluationContext中。
当授权相关的声明集通过自定义的AuthorizationPolicy被初始化之后，我们通过自定义ServiceAuthorizationManager来分析这些声明，并作做出当前操作是否被授权调用的最终判断。类似于SimpleAuthorizationPolicy，我们将自定义的ServiceAuthorizationManager起名为SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager，同样定义于Hosting项目中，下面是整个SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager类型的定义。
1: using System.IdentityModel.Claims;
2: using System.Security.Principal;
3: using System.ServiceModel;
4: namespace Artech.WcfServices.Hosting
5: { 6: public class SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager : ServiceAuthorizationManager
7: { 8: protected override bool CheckAccessCore(OperationContext operationContext)
9: { 10: string action = operationContext.RequestContext.RequestMessage.Headers.Action;
11: foreach (ClaimSet claimSet in operationContext.ServiceSecurityContext.AuthorizationContext.ClaimSets)
12: { 13: if (claimSet.Issuer == ClaimSet.System)
14: { 15: foreach (Claim c in claimSet.FindClaims(SimpleAuthorizationPolicy.ClaimType4AllowedOperation, Rights.PossessProperty))
16: { 17: if (action == c.Resource.ToString())
18: { 19: GenericIdentity identity = new GenericIdentity(""); 20: operationContext.ServiceSecurityContext.AuthorizationContext.Properties["Principal"] =
21: new GenericPrincipal(identity, null);
22: return true;
23: }
24: }
25: }
26: }
27: return false;
28: }
29: }
30: }
由于基于被授权操作的声明已经通过SimpleAuthorizationPolicy被成功添加到EvaluationContext的声明集列表，并最终作为当前AuthorizationContext声明集的一部分。那么，如果在这些代表被授权操作的声明中，具有一个是基于当前被调用的服务操作的声明，就意味着当前的服务操作调用被授权了的。这样的逻辑实现在重写的CheckAccessCore方法中。此外，还有一点需要注意的是：在做出成功授权的情况下，需要设置当前的安全主体，因为不管这个安全主体是否需要，WCF总是会试图从当前AuthorizationContext的属性列表中去获取该安全主体。如果没有，会抛出异常。
到目前为止，两个核心的自定义对象（SimpleAuthorizationPolicy和SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager）都已经创建好了，我们现在通过配置的方式将它们设置到应用到服务的ServiceAuthorizationBehavior服务行为上。下面两段XML片断分别表示服务寄宿和客户端的配置。
服务寄宿配置：
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6: <endpoint address="http://127.0.0.1/calculatorservice" binding="ws2007HttpBinding"
contract="Artech.WcfServices.Contracts.ICalculator"/>
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12: <serviceAuthorization principalPermissionMode="Custom"
serviceAuthorizationManagerType="Artech.WcfServices.Hosting.SimpleServiceAuthorizationManager,Artech.WcfServices.Hosting">
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
20:
21:
22:
客户端配置：
1:
2:
3:
4:
5: <endpoint name="calculatorService" address="http://127.0.0.1/calculatorservice" binding="ws2007HttpBinding"
contract="Artech.WcfServices.Contracts.ICalculator"/>
6:
7:
8:
我们最终需要验证的WCF是否能够按照我们自定义的策略进行授权。为了演示方便，我创建了如下一个名称为Invoke的辅助方法。Invoke方法的三个参数分别代表进行服务调用的委托、服务代理对象和操作名称。服务操作调用会在该方法中执行，并最终输出相应的文字表示服务调用是否成功。
1: static void Invoke(Actionaction, ICalculator proxy, string operation)
2: { 3: try
4: { 5: action(proxy);
6: Console.WriteLine("服务操作\"{0}\"调用成功...", operation); 7: }
8: catch (Exception ex)
9: { 10: Console.WriteLine("服务操作\"{0}\"调用失败...", operation); 11: }
12: }
在如下的代码中，我们分别以用户名Foo和Bar的名义通过上面的Invoke辅助方法对计算服务的四个操作进行访问。而程序执行的最终结果是和我们自定义的授权策略是一致的：用户Foo仅仅授予了调用Add和Substract操作的权限，而其余两个授权给用户Bar。
1: static void Main(string[] args)
2: { 3: ChannelFactorychannelFactory = new ChannelFactory ("calculatorService");
4: NetworkCredential credential = channelFactory.Credentials.Windows.ClientCredential;
5: credential.UserName = "Foo";
6: credential.Password = "Password";
7: ICalculator calculator = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
8: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Add(1, 2), calculator, "Add");
9: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Subtract(1, 2), calculator, "Subtract");
10: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Multiply(1, 2), calculator, "Multiply");
11: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Divide(1, 2), calculator, "Divide");
12: Console.WriteLine();
13:
14: channelFactory = new ChannelFactory("calculatorService");
15: credential = channelFactory.Credentials.Windows.ClientCredential;
16: credential.UserName = "Bar";
17: credential.Password = "Password";
18: calculator = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
19: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Add(1, 2), calculator, "Add");
20: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Subtract(1, 2), calculator, "Subtract");
21: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Multiply(1, 2), calculator, "Multiply");
22: Invoke(proxy => proxy.Divide(1, 2), calculator, "Divide");
23:
24: Console.Read();
25: }
输出结果：
1: 服务操作"Add"调用成功...
2: 服务操作"Subtract"调用成功...
3: 服务操作"Multiply"调用失败...
4: 服务操作"Divide"调用失败...
5:
6: 服务操作"Add"调用失败...
7: 服务操作"Subtract"调用失败...
8: 服务操作"Multiply"调用成功...
9: 服务操作"Divide"调用成功...